Which is the best choice when selecting fonts for a map?

When selecting fonts for a map, using only two different fonts that complement each other is considered the best practice for several reasons. Firstly, a limited number of fonts helps maintain visual clarity and coherence on the map. When a map is overloaded with different fonts, it can become visually chaotic and difficult for users to interpret the information presented.

Choosing two complementary fonts allows for differentiation between different types of information—such as one font for labels and another for headings or categories—while still creating a unified and harmonious look. This not only enhances readability but also assists in conveying the map's message clearly.

Using only one font might simplify the design but can hinder the ability to distinguish between various map elements effectively. While using up to four fonts can introduce diversity, it risks overwhelming the viewer and complicating the overall aesthetic. Also, employing any style of font without consideration can lead to issues with legibility and professionalism, which are crucial for effective map-making.

Thus, selecting two complementary fonts strikes a balance between visual appeal and clarity, ensuring the map remains functional and engaging.